Accountability Citizenship
Connect with the Author
  • Home
  • Register
  • Blog
  • Bookstore
  • Contact
  • Book Reviews
  • Spotlight

From Divine Right to the state of Nature...

5/17/2018

1 Comment

 
Picture
Perhaps it was the myth that Magna Carta afforded more rights to more people than it actually did.  Perhaps it was the realization that, once divine right became something shared between the king and some subset of society, there was no reason that subset should be anything less than "all of us".  But by the early enlightenment period, philosophers were justifying the powers of government and the rights of the governed using the concepts of a pre-governmental "state of nature" and a social contract.

​By the middle of the seventeenth century, Thomas Hobbes used these concepts to justify the absolute power of the monarch.  In Leviathan, published in 1651, Hobbes depicted the condition of humans without government of any kind.  Hobbes' concept of this "state of nature" was a war of all against all.  According to Hobbes, the benefit of exiting such a state required the surrender of individual liberty to a government with absolute power.

Other  philosophers almost immediately reacted to Hobbes' depiction of the state of nature.  Jean-Jacques Rousseau published his Discourse on the Origin of Inequality in 1754, and his depiction of the state of nature was precisely opposite that of Hobbes.  Rousseau felt that humans in such a condition would be living in accord with what he termed "uncorrupted morals."  The introduction of society was, for Rosseau, where corruption enters.  He opens his treatise entitled Social Contract Theory with the statement, "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains."

Within a few decades, John Locke had proposed yet another alternative vision of the state of nature as a place governed by a natural law that afforded everyone an equal right to life, liberty and property.  Locke published his Two Treatises of Government around 1689, although he did so anonymously. Needless to say, the social contract emerging from that state of nature was quite different from what Hobbes had envisioned. And it is this version of the social contract that is most often associated with the vision of the founders of the American republic, although the version published in 18th century America was incomplete.

The point here is not to endorse any one version of Enlightenment social contract theory. Rather, I think we should observe the fact that early social contract theorists injected different views of human nature into a state of nature and used that mechanism to generate a logical argument for a form of social contract--and hence for a form of government.  And nearly everyone agrees the "state of nature" is a hypothetical construct rather than any condition that actually existed.  Attempting to defend Locke's view of human nature, or Hobbes', or Rousseau's, reminds me of the old story of the three blind men describing an elephant.  The man who grasps the trunk proclaims that the elephant is like a snake, the one who touches the side asserts that the elephant is like a wall, and the one who hugs a leg is convinced the elephant is like a tree.  None of them are completely right as individuals, but they each have a piece of the truth.  Together, they provide a better approximation of "right" than any of them do alone.

Theorists modified the idea of a state of nature in the twentieth century to make significant improvements to the basic ideas expressed by the Enlightenment philosophers.  We'll take up that thread in our next blog.

1 Comment
college paper review link
6/18/2018 05:06:36 pm

I will never understand what this really meant but I think yes, we are all bound by the state of nature. Common sense may have been our greatest downfall because it fooled us into believing we are capable of making decisions for ourselves. The truth is, even if you may have consciously made the decision to take action, you were led there by situations and consequences from previous decisions that are not really within your control. Again, you may have been led. It's called destiny.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Author of Thy King Dumb Come and Accountability Citizenship, Stephen P. Tryon is a businessman and technologist with extensive experience in e-commerce, a retired Soldier, and former Senate Fellow.

    Register to Win Cool Stuff!

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    July 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn
Proudly powered by Weebly